Comments on: Welcome to Eugenics 101 http://www.2secondsfaster.com/archives/93 Are we there yet? Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:39:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: sam http://www.2secondsfaster.com/archives/93/comment-page-1#comment-74 sam Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:30:37 +0000 http://www.2secondsfaster.com/archives/93#comment-74 their claims that the triple screen test is 90% accurate are wrong as well. It is more like 95% innaccurate! If you get one thing wrong in the calculation, date of conception or date of test than that skews the result! This happened to a friend of mine. They got how far along she was wrong...inserted the wrong date and it came back that her child had down's. She refused to abort and her baby was fine when she was born. I know another woman who it took forever to get pregnant, she was 40 or a little older when she finally did become pregnant and she said if the test came back that she was carrying a baby with Down's she would have aborted! I just can't understand that... their claims that the triple screen test is 90% accurate are wrong as well. It is more like 95% innaccurate! If you get one thing wrong in the calculation, date of conception or date of test than that skews the result! This happened to a friend of mine. They got how far along she was wrong…inserted the wrong date and it came back that her child had down’s. She refused to abort and her baby was fine when she was born. I know another woman who it took forever to get pregnant, she was 40 or a little older when she finally did become pregnant and she said if the test came back that she was carrying a baby with Down’s she would have aborted! I just can’t understand that…

]]> By: Valerie Jane http://www.2secondsfaster.com/archives/93/comment-page-1#comment-72 Valerie Jane Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:41:57 +0000 http://www.2secondsfaster.com/archives/93#comment-72 When I was pregnant with my 1st child I did all the tests. I knew that I wouldn't abort or anything but I thought it would be best to be prepared and some of the neural tube defects can be improved by surgery in utero. We were all excited when we were told everything was negative. It didn't prepare us for premature labor, delivery and baby. He was born at 31 weeks gestation. He was 3 pounds 10 ounces and in the hospital for 35 days before he could go home. So much for the testing to be prepared! With my daughter I didn't do any testing. I figured there was no guarentee so why waste the money. Also, I was considered high risk so I knew there would be alot of ultra sounds done and that could detect things like spina bifida. I think what bothers me is the statistics. How do they know that there is a 5% failure rate when 90% are aborted? With the way some abortions are done there would be no way of knowing if the test was accurate just by looking at the baby. And I'm sure the mother isn't going to pay for the testing to be done to make sure. Now that women can 'choose' to abort earlier it will be impossible to know if that number is accurate. It just breaks my heart knowing that these children are "unwanted" just because they aren't perfect. Just because it will be more difficult to raise the child. Just because they don't want people to see them with a "child like that". Congrats on your daughter! 4 Children would be wonderful! That is until the teenage years.... ;-) but that's another subject altogether! When I was pregnant with my 1st child I did all the tests. I knew that I wouldn’t abort or anything but I thought it would be best to be prepared and some of the neural tube defects can be improved by surgery in utero. We were all excited when we were told everything was negative. It didn’t prepare us for premature labor, delivery and baby. He was born at 31 weeks gestation. He was 3 pounds 10 ounces and in the hospital for 35 days before he could go home. So much for the testing to be prepared! With my daughter I didn’t do any testing. I figured there was no guarentee so why waste the money. Also, I was considered high risk so I knew there would be alot of ultra sounds done and that could detect things like spina bifida.

I think what bothers me is the statistics. How do they know that there is a 5% failure rate when 90% are aborted? With the way some abortions are done there would be no way of knowing if the test was accurate just by looking at the baby. And I’m sure the mother isn’t going to pay for the testing to be done to make sure. Now that women can ‘choose’ to abort earlier it will be impossible to know if that number is accurate. It just breaks my heart knowing that these children are “unwanted” just because they aren’t perfect. Just because it will be more difficult to raise the child. Just because they don’t want people to see them with a “child like that”.

Congrats on your daughter! 4 Children would be wonderful! That is until the teenage years…. ;-) but that’s another subject altogether!

]]> By: sam http://www.2secondsfaster.com/archives/93/comment-page-1#comment-71 sam Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:30:50 +0000 http://www.2secondsfaster.com/archives/93#comment-71 when I got pregnant with my first 3 children, I was told I was having an amniocentesis. I told the Dr's each time that I wasn't and they said we'll talk about it later and I replied, "no we won't!" and that was the last they mentioned it. I had the triple screen blood test done b/c I was led to believe it was required in Jersey but I did it with the Dr's knowing that I wouldn't do anything regardless of the outcome. The test came back positive for Down's for my third child. They wanted to do an amniocentesis again and I refused. I let them do a level 2 ultrasound instead which showed that everything was okay. With my last child (#4), I was 39 years old and seeing an NFP only physician. They mentioned the triple screen test b/c they had to but were very happy when I turned it down. We did a level 2 ultrasound b/c of my "advanced age" but amniocentesis was never even mentioned! These are also the doctors that put me on progesterone b4 they had even seen me b/c I had had 2 miscarriages in the last year and knew that that was my problem. B/c of them I have a healthy 9 month old daughter now. It scares me to think of how many babies are being killed b/c they are less than perfect and how many babies are being killed who have no problems b/c the parents are worried or have been led to believe that there are problems... when I got pregnant with my first 3 children, I was told I was having an amniocentesis. I told the Dr’s each time that I wasn’t and they said we’ll talk about it later and I replied, “no we won’t!” and that was the last they mentioned it. I had the triple screen blood test done b/c I was led to believe it was required in Jersey but I did it with the Dr’s knowing that I wouldn’t do anything regardless of the outcome. The test came back positive for Down’s for my third child. They wanted to do an amniocentesis again and I refused. I let them do a level 2 ultrasound instead which showed that everything was okay. With my last child (#4), I was 39 years old and seeing an NFP only physician. They mentioned the triple screen test b/c they had to but were very happy when I turned it down. We did a level 2 ultrasound b/c of my “advanced age” but amniocentesis was never even mentioned! These are also the doctors that put me on progesterone b4 they had even seen me b/c I had had 2 miscarriages in the last year and knew that that was my problem. B/c of them I have a healthy 9 month old daughter now. It scares me to think of how many babies are being killed b/c they are less than perfect and how many babies are being killed who have no problems b/c the parents are worried or have been led to believe that there are problems…

]]>